<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please Don&#8217;t Replace Text Articles with Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goaliegirl.com/2008/10/29/please-dont-replace-text-articles-with-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goaliegirl.com/2008/10/29/please-dont-replace-text-articles-with-video/</link>
	<description>Hockey, gadgets and geekiness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:02:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darla Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.goaliegirl.com/2008/10/29/please-dont-replace-text-articles-with-video/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Darla Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goaliegirl.com/?p=260#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I agree that video should not be the whole post. They should at least put the text transcript of the video in the post, or do a summary of what the video contains. Isn&#039;t text the king of SEO? Aren&#039;t they going to lose out on some traffic by just having a video? Just wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that video should not be the whole post. They should at least put the text transcript of the video in the post, or do a summary of what the video contains. Isn&#8217;t text the king of SEO? Aren&#8217;t they going to lose out on some traffic by just having a video? Just wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Carmichael</title>
		<link>http://www.goaliegirl.com/2008/10/29/please-dont-replace-text-articles-with-video/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Carmichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goaliegirl.com/?p=260#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I think videos can be extremely useful for explaining certain processes and concepts (the CommonCraft videos come to mind) but they shouldn&#039;t, as you say, replace text. If I wanted to watch a TV show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think videos can be extremely useful for explaining certain processes and concepts (the CommonCraft videos come to mind) but they shouldn&#8217;t, as you say, replace text. If I wanted to watch a TV show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.goaliegirl.com/2008/10/29/please-dont-replace-text-articles-with-video/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goaliegirl.com/?p=260#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with this more. Video is not the best way to present most technical content. I have no problem reading RSS feeds during downtime at work, but heading over to YouTube and wasting bandwidth seems like an abuse of resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with this more. Video is not the best way to present most technical content. I have no problem reading RSS feeds during downtime at work, but heading over to YouTube and wasting bandwidth seems like an abuse of resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
